http://www.mysteriousetruscans.com/art/d3.jpg
http://www.mysteriousetruscans.com/art/d2.jpg
http://www.mysteriousetruscans.com/art/d1.jpg
http://www.mysteriousetruscans.com/art/dancers1.jpg
Модераторы: Aristoteles, Tibaren
OlgaTiho писал(а):/.../
Ну а вообщем, если рассматривать все остальное этрусское искусство IV-III вв. до н.э., то подтверждается именно первая версия.[/size]
Последовательность простых количественных числительных tu(n),
θu(n) — 1, zal — 2, ki, ci, (χi?) — 3, hut, huθ — 4, maχ — 5, śa, sa — 6, śemφ
— 7, cezp — 8, nurφ — 9, была впервые установлена для первых шести
чисел Г. Штольтенбергом [10, 234; ср. 3, 368; 5, 44; 8, 454] и, несмотря
на ряд более поздних гипотез [ср. 4, 60-61 и др.], является наиболее
(если не единственной) обоснованной.
pan писал(а):По этой ссылке можете найти более или менее развернутый материал по этрусским фрескам. http://rec.gerodot.ru/etruria/fresco.htm
kartlos писал(а):Немировски в своеий книге ЕТРУСКИ пишет; в Италие нашли шестигранние игралние кости на котором било написана PO ETRUSSKI словесно на каждом гранне соответственно КИ, МАХ, шА, ЦАЛ, ТУ, ХУТ.может ви расшифруите ети число?
Yana писал(а):http://starling.rinet.ru/Texts/numrus.pdf
Recognizing the relationship between Etruscan and the Nakh-Daghestanian languages may be of benefit in future studies of Etruscan as it confirms or clarifies the meanings of a number of items of vocabulary which have been obtained by the combinatorial method (such as the value of huth = "four”), or from bilinguals or ancient glosses, although it is far from being any sort of a general "key" to Etruscan because of the time depths involved. As regards the Etruscan numerals, recognition of this relationship provides, amongst other things, an explanation of the equivalence of the names Vilina = Sextus in the bilingual ET Cl 1.966 (TLE 925), and illuminates the ancient gloss TLE 857 vorsam = centenum pedes. On the basis of re-evaluating this existing material, it is proposed here that the original indigenous Etruscan word for "six", before its replacement by the borrowed word Sa, was *vili, and that the Etruscan for "100" was *vers or similar, As further such long-standing difficulties are resolved, this may in turn provide further validation of the relationship proposed here.
a) Etruscan thu ''one" : Chechen/Batsbi ts?'a, Ingush ts?’a or tsa3
The correspondences of Etruscan initial /th/: Nakh initial /ts/ and Etruscan final /u/: Nakh final /a/, are both regular as shown in II a and II b below.
b) Etruscan ki or ke ''three". Chechen/Ingush/Batsbi qo
The consonant correspondence Etruscan /k/: Nakh /q/ is regular and shown in II с below,
c) Etruscan huth "four'. Chechen Ingush =i?, Batsbi =?'iw?
While the meaning of this Etruscan word is not unanimously agreed, it is already supported by three separate pieces of evidence: i) the renaming of the Attic placename Hyttenia as Tetrapolis; ii) ET Та 7.81 (TLE 885) xarun huths ("fourthly, Charun") on the last of four painted figures in a tomb, and iii) universal relative corpus frequency statistics of numerals as suggested by Manchak (1983). Recognition of Etruscan's true affinities adds a fourth argument supporting the meaning "four' (not "six"), As explained above, the = in the Nakh forms represents a class marker inserted in compensation for an earlier deleted laryngeal and sound correspondences linking Etruscan words with an initial /h/ and Nakh words with an initial class marker [CM] are shown in part II e below,
d) Etruscan max “five”, Chechen mor, Ingush morh,. Batsbi morL “armful”
Etruscan max may instead be related to a Nakh-Daghestanian root for "handful". The relation between "5" and ''hand'' is common one in the languages of the world. The semantic extension "hand" > "arm" is also common.
In Daghestanian, this root for "handful" appears in a number of subgroups: in Tsezian there is Tsez meru, Hinukh meu and Hunzib moRu; in Lezgian. there are forms such as Lezgi mekw, Agul тех, Rutul mEx. Budukh теk etc., while in Udi there is maR and m a dialect of Agul merL is to be found; in Dargwa there is me?'.
e) Earlу or Pre-Etrusсan *vili “si x” : Chechen/Ingush jalx, В atsbi jatx/jetx
While, as is known, the standard Etruscan for "six" was Sa, the early or Pre- Etruscan *vili "six" is proposed here on the basis of the bilingual ET Cl 1.966 (TLE 925)
f) Etruscan *verS or *vers “hundred” Chechen b?’e. Ingush b’?ä
The Etruscan for “100'' has been proposed here by re-evaluating the ancient gloss TLE 857 The auslaut has been deleted in the Chechen and Ingush, which is a regular development for inherited final */rs/. The relationship of the Etruscan *vers to Nakh-Daghestanian is best seen by looking at the Daghestanian cognates where the final segments have not been deleted, Many of the Avar-Andi and Tsezian languages have beS- or similar.
Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и гости: 5